lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAM_iQpUF5rAXy7M5S=4tYtNKAnrmTHk+=1M9CR8xqj9VgSYqDg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 18 Nov 2019 21:43:07 -0800
From:   Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To:     Adeel Sharif <madeel.sharif@...glemail.com>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Unix domain socket missing error code

On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 12:56 AM Adeel Sharif
<madeel.sharif@...glemail.com> wrote:
>
> It should but it is not used when two different sockets are communicating.
> This is the third check in the if statement and it is never called
> because the first unlikely check was false:
>
> if (other != sk &&
>         unlikely(unix_peer(other) != sk && unix_recvq_full(other))) {
>

Good catch!

It seems you already have a reproducer to trigger this OOM? If so
please share. And let me see if and how I can fix it.

Thanks.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ