[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAM_iQpUF5rAXy7M5S=4tYtNKAnrmTHk+=1M9CR8xqj9VgSYqDg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2019 21:43:07 -0800
From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To: Adeel Sharif <madeel.sharif@...glemail.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Unix domain socket missing error code
On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 12:56 AM Adeel Sharif
<madeel.sharif@...glemail.com> wrote:
>
> It should but it is not used when two different sockets are communicating.
> This is the third check in the if statement and it is never called
> because the first unlikely check was false:
>
> if (other != sk &&
> unlikely(unix_peer(other) != sk && unix_recvq_full(other))) {
>
Good catch!
It seems you already have a reproducer to trigger this OOM? If so
please share. And let me see if and how I can fix it.
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists