[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20191121090609.13048-1-sgarzare@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 10:06:09 +0100
From: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
To: davem@...emloft.net
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
syzbot+e2e5c07bf353b2f79daa@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>,
Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>,
Jorgen Hansen <jhansen@...are.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next] vsock: avoid to assign transport if its initialization fails
If transport->init() fails, we can't assign the transport to the
socket, because it's not initialized correctly, and any future
calls to the transport callbacks would have an unexpected behavior.
Fixes: c0cfa2d8a788 ("vsock: add multi-transports support")
Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+e2e5c07bf353b2f79daa@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
---
net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c | 9 ++++++++-
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
index cc8659838bf2..74db4cd637a7 100644
--- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
@@ -412,6 +412,7 @@ int vsock_assign_transport(struct vsock_sock *vsk, struct vsock_sock *psk)
const struct vsock_transport *new_transport;
struct sock *sk = sk_vsock(vsk);
unsigned int remote_cid = vsk->remote_addr.svm_cid;
+ int ret;
switch (sk->sk_type) {
case SOCK_DGRAM:
@@ -443,9 +444,15 @@ int vsock_assign_transport(struct vsock_sock *vsk, struct vsock_sock *psk)
if (!new_transport || !try_module_get(new_transport->module))
return -ENODEV;
+ ret = new_transport->init(vsk, psk);
+ if (ret) {
+ module_put(new_transport->module);
+ return ret;
+ }
+
vsk->transport = new_transport;
- return vsk->transport->init(vsk, psk);
+ return 0;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vsock_assign_transport);
--
2.21.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists