netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH net-next] net: phylink: rename mac_link_state() op to mac_pcs_get

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20191121021740.GE18325@lunn.ch>
Date:   Thu, 21 Nov 2019 03:17:40 +0100
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
Cc:     Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
        Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
        Felix Fietkau <nbd@...nwrt.org>,
        John Crispin <john@...ozen.org>,
        Mark Lee <Mark-MC.Lee@...iatek.com>,
        Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
        Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
        Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>,
        Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
        Radhey Shyam Pandey <radhey.shyam.pandey@...inx.com>,
        Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next] net: phylink: rename mac_link_state() op to
 mac_pcs_get_state()

> This is something I'd like to do to make it clearer what phylink expects
> of this function, and that it shouldn't just read-back how the MAC was
> configured.  However, it will require some testing and review as it
> changes quite a lot, and there's some things, particularly in DSA, that
> don't seem quite right from a phylink point of view, such as messing
> with state->interface in this function.

Hi Russell

Could you have more detail about DSA issues? Do you means the 6250
setting interface to PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_NA?

I think you and i have pretty similar marvell hardware. So i don't
think i can do much additional testing. Ideally we want Florian to do
some testing on b53.

Andrew