[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <08304ec7-09f7-c116-e942-6d384ee67f47@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2019 19:52:25 -0800
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
Felix Fietkau <nbd@...nwrt.org>,
John Crispin <john@...ozen.org>,
Mark Lee <Mark-MC.Lee@...iatek.com>,
Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Radhey Shyam Pandey <radhey.shyam.pandey@...inx.com>,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next] net: phylink: rename mac_link_state() op to
mac_pcs_get_state()
On 11/20/2019 6:17 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>> This is something I'd like to do to make it clearer what phylink expects
>> of this function, and that it shouldn't just read-back how the MAC was
>> configured. However, it will require some testing and review as it
>> changes quite a lot, and there's some things, particularly in DSA, that
>> don't seem quite right from a phylink point of view, such as messing
>> with state->interface in this function.
>
> Hi Russell
>
> Could you have more detail about DSA issues? Do you means the 6250
> setting interface to PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_NA?
>
> I think you and i have pretty similar marvell hardware. So i don't
> think i can do much additional testing. Ideally we want Florian to do
> some testing on b53.
I will try to test that across the hardware I have at hand, can take a
few days to get all platforms working with net-next. At first glance,
this is just a simple rename and change of return type, I would not
expect problems to arise from that.
--
Florian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists