lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 11:14:33 -0800 (PST) From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> To: tglx@...utronix.de CC: ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, bpf@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: bpf and local lock Thomas, I am working on eliminating the explicit softirq disables around BPF program invocation and replacing it with local lock usage instead. We would really need to at least have the non-RT stubs upstream to propagate this cleanly, do you think this is possible? Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists