[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191125112359.7a468352@cakuba.hsd1.ca.comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 11:23:59 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
To: Thomas Falcon <tlfalcon@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
dnbanerg@...ibm.com, brking@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
julietk@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 0/4] ibmvnic: Harden device commands and queries
On Mon, 25 Nov 2019 12:40:42 -0600, Thomas Falcon wrote:
> On 11/23/19 7:49 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Fri, 22 Nov 2019 13:41:42 -0600, Thomas Falcon wrote:
> >> This patch series fixes some shortcomings with the current
> >> VNIC device command implementation. The first patch fixes
> >> the initialization of driver completion structures used
> >> for device commands. Additionally, all waits for device
> >> commands are bounded with a timeout in the event that the
> >> device does not respond or becomes inoperable. Finally,
> >> serialize queries to retain the integrity of device return
> >> codes.
> > I have minor comments on two patches, but also I think it's
> > a little late in the release cycle for putting this in net.
> >
> > Could you target net-next and repost ASAP so it still makes
> > it into 5.5?
>
> Thank you, sorry for the late response. I will make the requested
> changes ASAP, but I've missed the net-next window. What should I target
> for v2?
You're right, sticking to "net" makes sense at this point.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists