| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <ee1a369f-58c7-1fd4-f0fe-09b2a9900931@mellanox.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2019 13:50:25 +0000
From: Roi Dayan <roid@...lanox.com>
To: wenxu <wenxu@...oud.cn>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: Bad performance for VF outgoing in offloaded mode
On 2019-11-28 7:03 AM, wenxu wrote:
> Hi mellanox team,
>
>
> I did a performance test for tc offload with upstream kernel:
>
> I setup a vm with a VF as eth0
>
> In the vm:
>
> ifconfig eth0 10.0.0.75/24 up
>
>
> On the host the mlx_p0 is the pf representor and mlx_pf0vf0 is the vf representor
>
> The device in the switchdev mode
>
> # grep -ri "" /sys/class/net/*/phys_* 2>/dev/null
> /sys/class/net/mlx_p0/phys_port_name:p0
> /sys/class/net/mlx_p0/phys_switch_id:34ebc100034b6b50
> /sys/class/net/mlx_pf0vf0/phys_port_name:pf0vf0
> /sys/class/net/mlx_pf0vf0/phys_switch_id:34ebc100034b6b50
> /sys/class/net/mlx_pf0vf1/phys_port_name:pf0vf1
> /sys/class/net/mlx_pf0vf1/phys_switch_id:34ebc100034b6b50
>
>
> The tc filter as following: just forward ip/arp packets in mlx_p0 and mlx_pf0vf0 each other
>
> tc qdisc add dev mlx_p0 ingress
> tc qdisc add dev mlx_pf0vf0 ingress
>
> tc filter add dev mlx_pf0vf0 pref 2 ingress protocol ip flower skip_sw action mirred egress redirect dev mlx_p0
> tc filter add dev mlx_p0 pref 2 ingress protocol ip flower skip_sw action mirred egress redirect dev mlx_pf0vf0
>
> tc filter add dev mlx_pf0vf0 pref 1 ingress protocol arp flower skip_sw action mirred egress redirect dev mlx_p0
> tc filter add dev mlx_p0 pref 1 ingress protocol arp flower skip_sw action mirred egress redirect dev mlx_pf0vf0
>
>
> The remote server device eth0:
>
> ifconfig eth0 10.0.0.241/24
>
>
> test case 1: tcp recieve from VF to PF
>
> In the vm: iperf -s
>
> On the remote server:
>
> iperf -c 10.0.0.75 -t 10 -i 2
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> Client connecting to 10.0.0.75, TCP port 5001
> TCP window size: 85.0 KByte (default)
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> [ 3] local 10.0.0.241 port 59708 connected with 10.0.0.75 port 5001
> [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
> [ 3] 0.0- 2.0 sec 5.40 GBytes 23.2 Gbits/sec
> [ 3] 2.0- 4.0 sec 5.35 GBytes 23.0 Gbits/sec
> [ 3] 4.0- 6.0 sec 5.46 GBytes 23.5 Gbits/sec
> [ 3] 6.0- 8.0 sec 5.10 GBytes 21.9 Gbits/sec
> [ 3] 8.0-10.0 sec 5.36 GBytes 23.0 Gbits/sec
> [ 3] 0.0-10.0 sec 26.7 GBytes 22.9 Gbits/sec
>
>
> Good performance with offload.
>
> # tc -s filter ls dev mlx_p0 ingress
> filter protocol arp pref 1 flower chain 0
> filter protocol arp pref 1 flower chain 0 handle 0x1
> eth_type arp
> skip_sw
> in_hw in_hw_count 1
> action order 1: mirred (Egress Redirect to device mlx_pf0vf0) stolen
> index 4 ref 1 bind 1 installed 971 sec used 82 sec
> Action statistics:
> Sent 420 bytes 7 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0)
> Sent software 0 bytes 0 pkt
> Sent hardware 420 bytes 7 pkt
> backlog 0b 0p requeues 0
>
> filter protocol ip pref 2 flower chain 0
> filter protocol ip pref 2 flower chain 0 handle 0x1
> eth_type ipv4
> skip_sw
> in_hw in_hw_count 1
> action order 1: mirred (Egress Redirect to device mlx_pf0vf0) stolen
> index 2 ref 1 bind 1 installed 972 sec used 67 sec
> Action statistics:
> Sent 79272204362 bytes 91511261 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0)
> Sent software 0 bytes 0 pkt
> Sent hardware 79272204362 bytes 91511261 pkt
> backlog 0b 0p requeues 0
>
> # tc -s filter ls dev mlx_pf0vf0 ingress
> filter protocol arp pref 1 flower chain 0
> filter protocol arp pref 1 flower chain 0 handle 0x1
> eth_type arp
> skip_sw
> in_hw in_hw_count 1
> action order 1: mirred (Egress Redirect to device mlx_p0) stolen
> index 3 ref 1 bind 1 installed 978 sec used 88 sec
> Action statistics:
> Sent 600 bytes 10 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0)
> Sent software 0 bytes 0 pkt
> Sent hardware 600 bytes 10 pkt
> backlog 0b 0p requeues 0
>
> filter protocol ip pref 2 flower chain 0
> filter protocol ip pref 2 flower chain 0 handle 0x1
> eth_type ipv4
> skip_sw
> in_hw in_hw_count 1
> action order 1: mirred (Egress Redirect to device mlx_p0) stolen
> index 1 ref 1 bind 1 installed 978 sec used 73 sec
> Action statistics:
> Sent 71556027574 bytes 47805525 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0)
> Sent software 0 bytes 0 pkt
> Sent hardware 71556027574 bytes 47805525 pkt
> backlog 0b 0p requeues 0
>
>
>
> test case 2: tcp send from VF to PF
>
> On the reomte server: iperf -s
>
> in the vm:
>
> # iperf -c 10.0.0.241 -t 10 -i 2
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> Client connecting to 10.0.0.241, TCP port 5001
> TCP window size: 230 KByte (default)
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> [ 3] local 10.0.0.75 port 53166 connected with 10.0.0.241 port 5001
> [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
> [ 3] 0.0- 2.0 sec 939 MBytes 3.94 Gbits/sec
> [ 3] 2.0- 4.0 sec 944 MBytes 3.96 Gbits/sec
> [ 3] 4.0- 6.0 sec 1.01 GBytes 4.34 Gbits/sec
> [ 3] 6.0- 8.0 sec 1.03 GBytes 4.44 Gbits/sec
> [ 3] 8.0-10.0 sec 1.02 GBytes 4.39 Gbits/sec
> [ 3] 0.0-10.0 sec 4.90 GBytes 4.21 Gbits/sec
>
>
> Bad performance with offload. All the packet are offloaded.
>
> It is the offload problem in the hardware?
>
>
> BR
>
> wenxu
>
>
Hi Wenxu,
We didn't notice this behavior.
Could it be your VM doesn't have enough resources to generate the traffic?
As a listener it's only sending the acks.
Thanks,
Roi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists