[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <71305dd0f15bd065f9b1eedd4f61123e@dlink.ru>
Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2019 18:06:09 +0300
From: Alexander Lobakin <alobakin@...nk.ru>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Muciri Gatimu <muciri@...nmesh.com>,
Shashidhar Lakkavalli <shashidhar.lakkavalli@...nmesh.com>,
John Crispin <john@...ozen.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Matteo Croce <mcroce@...hat.com>,
Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@...udflare.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Paul Blakey <paulb@...lanox.com>,
Yoshiki Komachi <komachi.yoshiki@...il.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: dsa: fix flow dissection on Tx path
Florian Fainelli wrote 06.12.2019 06:28:
> On 12/5/2019 2:02 AM, Alexander Lobakin wrote:
>> Commit 43e665287f93 ("net-next: dsa: fix flow dissection") added an
>> ability to override protocol and network offset during flow dissection
>> for DSA-enabled devices (i.e. controllers shipped as switch CPU ports)
>> in order to fix skb hashing for RPS on Rx path.
>>
>> However, skb_hash() and added part of code can be invoked not only on
>> Rx, but also on Tx path if we have a multi-queued device and:
>> - kernel is running on UP system or
>> - XPS is not configured.
>>
>> The call stack in this two cases will be like: dev_queue_xmit() ->
>> __dev_queue_xmit() -> netdev_core_pick_tx() -> netdev_pick_tx() ->
>> skb_tx_hash() -> skb_get_hash().
>>
>> The problem is that skbs queued for Tx have both network offset and
>> correct protocol already set up even after inserting a CPU tag by DSA
>> tagger, so calling tag_ops->flow_dissect() on this path actually only
>> breaks flow dissection and hashing.
>>
>> This can be observed by adding debug prints just before and right
>> after
>> tag_ops->flow_dissect() call to the related block of code:
>>
>> Before the patch:
>>
>> Rx path (RPS):
>>
>> [ 19.240001] Rx: proto: 0x00f8, nhoff: 0 /* ETH_P_XDSA */
>> [ 19.244271] tag_ops->flow_dissect()
>> [ 19.247811] Rx: proto: 0x0800, nhoff: 8 /* ETH_P_IP */
>>
>> [ 19.215435] Rx: proto: 0x00f8, nhoff: 0 /* ETH_P_XDSA */
>> [ 19.219746] tag_ops->flow_dissect()
>> [ 19.223241] Rx: proto: 0x0806, nhoff: 8 /* ETH_P_ARP */
>>
>> [ 18.654057] Rx: proto: 0x00f8, nhoff: 0 /* ETH_P_XDSA */
>> [ 18.658332] tag_ops->flow_dissect()
>> [ 18.661826] Rx: proto: 0x8100, nhoff: 8 /* ETH_P_8021Q */
>>
>> Tx path (UP system):
>>
>> [ 18.759560] Tx: proto: 0x0800, nhoff: 26 /* ETH_P_IP */
>> [ 18.763933] tag_ops->flow_dissect()
>> [ 18.767485] Tx: proto: 0x920b, nhoff: 34 /* junk */
>>
>> [ 22.800020] Tx: proto: 0x0806, nhoff: 26 /* ETH_P_ARP */
>> [ 22.804392] tag_ops->flow_dissect()
>> [ 22.807921] Tx: proto: 0x920b, nhoff: 34 /* junk */
>>
>> [ 16.898342] Tx: proto: 0x86dd, nhoff: 26 /* ETH_P_IPV6 */
>> [ 16.902705] tag_ops->flow_dissect()
>> [ 16.906227] Tx: proto: 0x920b, nhoff: 34 /* junk */
>>
>> After:
>>
>> Rx path (RPS):
>>
>> [ 16.520993] Rx: proto: 0x00f8, nhoff: 0 /* ETH_P_XDSA */
>> [ 16.525260] tag_ops->flow_dissect()
>> [ 16.528808] Rx: proto: 0x0800, nhoff: 8 /* ETH_P_IP */
>>
>> [ 15.484807] Rx: proto: 0x00f8, nhoff: 0 /* ETH_P_XDSA */
>> [ 15.490417] tag_ops->flow_dissect()
>> [ 15.495223] Rx: proto: 0x0806, nhoff: 8 /* ETH_P_ARP */
>>
>> [ 17.134621] Rx: proto: 0x00f8, nhoff: 0 /* ETH_P_XDSA */
>> [ 17.138895] tag_ops->flow_dissect()
>> [ 17.142388] Rx: proto: 0x8100, nhoff: 8 /* ETH_P_8021Q */
>>
>> Tx path (UP system):
>>
>> [ 15.499558] Tx: proto: 0x0800, nhoff: 26 /* ETH_P_IP */
>>
>> [ 20.664689] Tx: proto: 0x0806, nhoff: 26 /* ETH_P_ARP */
>>
>> [ 18.565782] Tx: proto: 0x86dd, nhoff: 26 /* ETH_P_IPV6 */
>>
>> In order to fix that we can add the check 'proto == htons(ETH_P_XDSA)'
>> to prevent code from calling tag_ops->flow_dissect() on Tx.
>> I also decided to initialize 'offset' variable so tagger callbacks can
>> now safely leave it untouched without provoking a chaos.
>>
>> Fixes: 43e665287f93 ("net-next: dsa: fix flow dissection")
>> Signed-off-by: Alexander Lobakin <alobakin@...nk.ru>
>
> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
So Dave, you can pick it up into your fixes tree if I understand
correctly.
There will be further work on DSA Rx path, but it's a subject for
next Linux release cycles essentially.
Regards,
ᚷ ᛖ ᚢ ᚦ ᚠ ᚱ
Powered by blists - more mailing lists