[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191210175121.GC46@ziepe.ca>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2019 13:51:21 -0400
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
Cc: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, Dave Ertman <david.m.ertman@...el.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
nhorman@...hat.com, sassmann@...hat.com, parav@...lanox.com,
Kiran Patil <kiran.patil@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/20] virtual-bus: Implementation of Virtual Bus
On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 08:49:29AM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
> > +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Lightweight Virtual Bus");
> > +MODULE_AUTHOR("David Ertman <david.m.ertman@...el.com>");
> > +MODULE_AUTHOR("Kiran Patil <kiran.patil@...el.com>");
> > +
> > +static DEFINE_IDA(virtbus_dev_ida);
>
> I was under impression that usage of IDA interface is discouraged in favor
> of direct calls to XArray.
IDA is OK, idr should be xarray
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists