lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191210095105.1f0008f5@cakuba.netronome.com>
Date:   Tue, 10 Dec 2019 09:51:05 -0800
From:   Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
To:     Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Cc:     Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@...e.cz>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        John Linville <linville@...driver.com>,
        Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
        Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/5] rtnetlink: provide permanent hardware
 address in RTM_NEWLINK

On Tue, 10 Dec 2019 14:07:53 +0100 (CET), Michal Kubecek wrote:
> @@ -1822,6 +1826,7 @@ static const struct nla_policy ifla_policy[IFLA_MAX+1] = {
>  	[IFLA_PROP_LIST]	= { .type = NLA_NESTED },
>  	[IFLA_ALT_IFNAME]	= { .type = NLA_STRING,
>  				    .len = ALTIFNAMSIZ - 1 },
> +	[IFLA_PERM_ADDRESS]	= { .type = NLA_REJECT },
>  };
>  
>  static const struct nla_policy ifla_info_policy[IFLA_INFO_MAX+1] = {

Jiri, I just noticed ifla_policy didn't get strict_start_type set when
ALT_IFNAME was added, should we add it in net? 🤔

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ