[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20191211142016.13215-1-liuhangbin@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2019 22:20:16 +0800
From: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>,
Jiri Benc <jbenc@...hat.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH net] ipv6/addrconf: only check invalid header values when NETLINK_F_STRICT_CHK is set
In patch 4b1373de73a3 ("net: ipv6: addr: perform strict checks also for doit
handlers") we add strict check for inet6_rtm_getaddr(). But we did the
invalid header values check before checking if NETLINK_F_STRICT_CHK is
set. This may break backwards compatibility if user already set the
ifm->ifa_prefixlen, ifm->ifa_flags, ifm->ifa_scope in their netlink code.
I didn't move the nlmsg_len check becuase I thought it's a valid check.
Reported-by: Jianlin Shi <jishi@...hat.com>
Fixes: 4b1373de73a3 ("net: ipv6: addr: perform strict checks also for doit handlers")
Signed-off-by: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
---
net/ipv6/addrconf.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
index 98d82305d6de..39d861d00377 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
@@ -5231,16 +5231,16 @@ static int inet6_rtm_valid_getaddr_req(struct sk_buff *skb,
return -EINVAL;
}
+ if (!netlink_strict_get_check(skb))
+ return nlmsg_parse_deprecated(nlh, sizeof(*ifm), tb, IFA_MAX,
+ ifa_ipv6_policy, extack);
+
ifm = nlmsg_data(nlh);
if (ifm->ifa_prefixlen || ifm->ifa_flags || ifm->ifa_scope) {
NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Invalid values in header for get address request");
return -EINVAL;
}
- if (!netlink_strict_get_check(skb))
- return nlmsg_parse_deprecated(nlh, sizeof(*ifm), tb, IFA_MAX,
- ifa_ipv6_policy, extack);
-
err = nlmsg_parse_deprecated_strict(nlh, sizeof(*ifm), tb, IFA_MAX,
ifa_ipv6_policy, extack);
if (err)
--
2.19.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists