lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 14 Dec 2019 12:10:49 -0800
From:   Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
To:     Xu Wang <vulab@...as.ac.cn>
Cc:     peppe.cavallaro@...com, alexandre.torgue@...com,
        joabreu@...opsys.com, davem@...emloft.net,
        mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] stmmac: platform: Remove unnecessary conditions

On Wed, 11 Dec 2019 10:31:24 +0000, Xu Wang wrote:
> Remove conditions where if and else branch are identical.
> This issue is detected by coccinelle.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Xu Wang <vulab@...as.ac.cn>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_platform.c | 2 --
>  1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_platform.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_platform.c
> index bedaff0..1d26691 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_platform.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_platform.c
> @@ -229,8 +229,6 @@ static int stmmac_mtl_setup(struct platform_device *pdev,
>  		plat->tx_sched_algorithm = MTL_TX_ALGORITHM_WFQ;
>  	else if (of_property_read_bool(tx_node, "snps,tx-sched-dwrr"))
>  		plat->tx_sched_algorithm = MTL_TX_ALGORITHM_DWRR;
> -	else if (of_property_read_bool(tx_node, "snps,tx-sched-sp"))
> -		plat->tx_sched_algorithm = MTL_TX_ALGORITHM_SP;
>  	else
>  		plat->tx_sched_algorithm = MTL_TX_ALGORITHM_SP;
>  

Thanks for the patch but in this case it looks like this code is
intentionally written this way to enumerate all options. Maintainers -
please speak up if you prefer to have the patch applied, otherwise 
I'm dropping it.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ