[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BN8PR12MB32666747FFF4AFD047F19EA5D3510@BN8PR12MB3266.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2019 09:22:13 +0000
From: Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>,
Xu Wang <vulab@...as.ac.cn>
CC: "peppe.cavallaro@...com" <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
"alexandre.torgue@...com" <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com" <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com"
<linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] stmmac: platform: Remove unnecessary conditions
From: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
Date: Dec/14/2019, 20:10:49 (UTC+00:00)
> On Wed, 11 Dec 2019 10:31:24 +0000, Xu Wang wrote:
> > Remove conditions where if and else branch are identical.
> > This issue is detected by coccinelle.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Xu Wang <vulab@...as.ac.cn>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_platform.c | 2 --
> > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_platform.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_platform.c
> > index bedaff0..1d26691 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_platform.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_platform.c
> > @@ -229,8 +229,6 @@ static int stmmac_mtl_setup(struct platform_device *pdev,
> > plat->tx_sched_algorithm = MTL_TX_ALGORITHM_WFQ;
> > else if (of_property_read_bool(tx_node, "snps,tx-sched-dwrr"))
> > plat->tx_sched_algorithm = MTL_TX_ALGORITHM_DWRR;
> > - else if (of_property_read_bool(tx_node, "snps,tx-sched-sp"))
> > - plat->tx_sched_algorithm = MTL_TX_ALGORITHM_SP;
> > else
> > plat->tx_sched_algorithm = MTL_TX_ALGORITHM_SP;
> >
>
> Thanks for the patch but in this case it looks like this code is
> intentionally written this way to enumerate all options. Maintainers -
> please speak up if you prefer to have the patch applied, otherwise
> I'm dropping it.
I rather prefer having all options clearly enumerated so I agree with
Jakub on this.
---
Thanks,
Jose Miguel Abreu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists