[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191217171539.GA16538@martin-VirtualBox>
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2019 22:45:39 +0530
From: Martin Varghese <martinvarghesenokia@...il.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, pshelar@....org,
scott.drennan@...ia.com, jbenc@...hat.com,
martin.varghese@...ia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 3/3] openvswitch: New MPLS actions for layer
2 tunnelling
On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 04:13:55PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Dec 2019 19:33:43 +0530, Martin Varghese wrote:
> > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/openvswitch.h b/include/uapi/linux/openvswitch.h
> > index a87b44c..b7221ad 100644
> > --- a/include/uapi/linux/openvswitch.h
> > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/openvswitch.h
> > @@ -673,6 +673,25 @@ struct ovs_action_push_mpls {
> > };
> >
> > /**
> > + * struct ovs_action_ptap_push_mpls - %OVS_ACTION_ATTR_PTAP_PUSH_MPLS action
> > + * argument.
> > + * @mpls_lse: MPLS label stack entry to push.
> > + * @mpls_ethertype: Ethertype to set in the encapsulating ethernet frame.
> > + * @l2_tun: Flag to specify the place of insertion of MPLS header.
> > + * When true, the MPLS header will be inserted at the start of the packet.
> > + * When false, the MPLS header will be inserted at the start of the l3 header.
> > + *
> > + * The only values @mpls_ethertype should ever be given are %ETH_P_MPLS_UC and
> > + * %ETH_P_MPLS_MC, indicating MPLS unicast or multicast. Other are rejected.
> > + */
> > +struct ovs_action_ptap_push_mpls {
> > + __be32 mpls_lse;
> > + __be16 mpls_ethertype; /* Either %ETH_P_MPLS_UC or %ETH_P_MPLS_MC */
> > + bool l2_tun;
>
> In file included from <command-line>:32:
> ./usr/include/linux/openvswitch.h:674:2: error: unknown type name ‘bool’
> 674 | bool l2_tun;
> | ^~~~
> make[3]: *** [usr/include/linux/openvswitch.hdrtest] Error 1
>
Does that mean bool cannot be used in interface header files ? but what is
the alternative u8?
> > +};
> > +
> > +
>
> Why the double new line? Please use checkpatch --strict.
Noted
Thanks for your time.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists