[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20191218.123716.1806707418521871245.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2019 12:37:16 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com
Cc: ldir@...byshire-bryant.me.uk, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] sch_cake: drop unused variable
tin_quantum_prio
From: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2019 09:53:40 -0800
> On Wed, 18 Dec 2019 14:05:13 +0000, Kevin 'ldir' Darbyshire-Bryant
> wrote:
>> Turns out tin_quantum_prio isn't used anymore and is a leftover from a
>> previous implementation of diffserv tins. Since the variable isn't used
>> in any calculations it can be eliminated.
>>
>> Drop variable and places where it was set. Rename remaining variable
>> and consolidate naming of intermediate variables that set it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant <ldir@...byshire-bryant.me.uk>
>
> Checkpatch sayeth:
>
> WARNING: Missing Signed-off-by: line by nominal patch author 'Kevin 'ldir' Darbyshire-Bryant <ldir@...byshire-bryant.me.uk>'
Which is kinda rediculous wouldn't you say? :-)
The warning stops to be useful if it's going to be applied in situations
like this where merely a nickname 'ldir' is added to the middle of the
person's formal name.
I would never push back on a patch on these grounds, it just wastes time.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists