[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191219203329.75d4bead@carbon>
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2019 20:33:29 +0100
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
Cc: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...il.com>,
Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
"Karlsson, Magnus" <magnus.karlsson@...el.com>,
Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@...il.com>,
Maciej Fijalkowski <maciejromanfijalkowski@...il.com>,
brouer@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 0/8] Simplify
xdp_do_redirect_map()/xdp_do_flush_map() and XDP maps
On Wed, 18 Dec 2019 16:39:08 -0800
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 4:04 AM Jesper Dangaard Brouer
> <brouer@...hat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 18 Dec 2019 12:39:53 +0100
> > Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, 18 Dec 2019 at 12:11, Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, 18 Dec 2019 11:53:52 +0100
> > > > Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...il.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > $ sudo ./xdp_redirect_cpu --dev enp134s0f0 --cpu 22 xdp_cpu_map0
> > > > >
> > > > > Running XDP/eBPF prog_name:xdp_cpu_map5_lb_hash_ip_pairs
> > > > > XDP-cpumap CPU:to pps drop-pps extra-info
> > > > > XDP-RX 20 7723038 0 0
> > > > > XDP-RX total 7723038 0
> > > > > cpumap_kthread total 0 0 0
> > > > > redirect_err total 0 0
> > > > > xdp_exception total 0 0
> > > >
> > > > Hmm... I'm missing some counters on the kthread side.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Oh? Any ideas why? I just ran the upstream sample straight off.
> >
> > Looks like it happened in commit: bbaf6029c49c ("samples/bpf: Convert
> > XDP samples to libbpf usage") (Cc Maciej).
> >
> > The old bpf_load.c will auto attach the tracepoints... for and libbpf
> > you have to be explicit about it.
>
> ... or you can use skeleton, which will auto-attach them as well,
> provided BPF program's section names follow expected naming
> convention. So it might be a good idea to try it out.
To Andrii, can you provide some more info on how to use this new
skeleton system of yours? (Pointers to code examples?)
--
Best regards,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer
MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer
Powered by blists - more mailing lists