[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4e5cb0b0-14b9-5de9-4346-e4c2955e99a0@iogearbox.net>
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2019 21:08:36 +0100
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
Cc: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...il.com>,
Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
"Karlsson, Magnus" <magnus.karlsson@...el.com>,
Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@...il.com>,
Maciej Fijalkowski <maciejromanfijalkowski@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 0/8] Simplify
xdp_do_redirect_map()/xdp_do_flush_map() and XDP maps
On 12/19/19 8:33 PM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Dec 2019 16:39:08 -0800
> Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 4:04 AM Jesper Dangaard Brouer
>> <brouer@...hat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, 18 Dec 2019 12:39:53 +0100
>>> Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...il.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, 18 Dec 2019 at 12:11, Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, 18 Dec 2019 11:53:52 +0100
>>>>> Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...il.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> $ sudo ./xdp_redirect_cpu --dev enp134s0f0 --cpu 22 xdp_cpu_map0
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Running XDP/eBPF prog_name:xdp_cpu_map5_lb_hash_ip_pairs
>>>>>> XDP-cpumap CPU:to pps drop-pps extra-info
>>>>>> XDP-RX 20 7723038 0 0
>>>>>> XDP-RX total 7723038 0
>>>>>> cpumap_kthread total 0 0 0
>>>>>> redirect_err total 0 0
>>>>>> xdp_exception total 0 0
>>>>>
>>>>> Hmm... I'm missing some counters on the kthread side.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Oh? Any ideas why? I just ran the upstream sample straight off.
>>>
>>> Looks like it happened in commit: bbaf6029c49c ("samples/bpf: Convert
>>> XDP samples to libbpf usage") (Cc Maciej).
>>>
>>> The old bpf_load.c will auto attach the tracepoints... for and libbpf
>>> you have to be explicit about it.
>>
>> ... or you can use skeleton, which will auto-attach them as well,
>> provided BPF program's section names follow expected naming
>> convention. So it might be a good idea to try it out.
>
> To Andrii, can you provide some more info on how to use this new
> skeleton system of yours? (Pointers to code examples?)
There's a man page ;-)
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git/tree/tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-gen.rst
Powered by blists - more mailing lists