netdev - Re: libbpf distro packaging

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <824912a1-048e-9e95-f6be-fd2b481a8cfc@fb.com>
Date:   Thu, 19 Dec 2019 21:37:23 +0000
From:   Julia Kartseva <hex@...com>
To:     Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
CC:     Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...com>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>,
        "labbott@...hat.com" <labbott@...hat.com>,
        "acme@...nel.org" <acme@...nel.org>,
        "debian-kernel@...ts.debian.org" <debian-kernel@...ts.debian.org>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andrey Ignatov <rdna@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
        "jolsa@...nel.org" <jolsa@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        "md@...ux.it" <md@...ux.it>
Subject: Re: libbpf distro packaging

Hi Jiri,

1. v. 0.0.6 is out [1], could you please package it?
2. we might need a small spec update due to zlib is made an explicit
dependency in [2]. zlib should be listed in BuildRequires: section of the
spec so it's consistent with libbpf.pc
3. Do you plan to address the bug report [3] for CentOS? Namely rebuilding
Fedora's RPM and publishing to EPEL repo?

Thanks

[1] https://github.com/libbpf/libbpf/releases/tag/v0.0.6
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20191216183830.3972964-1-andriin@fb.com/
[3] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1762219

On 10/16/19 3:01 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 09:14:19PM +0000, Julia Kartseva wrote:
>> Hi Jiri,
>>
>> systemd folks published libbpf CentOS 7 package in systemd corp repo: [1],
>> so guess that proves that deps from other repo are fine.
> 
> yea, actualy got request for that:
>   https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1762219
> 
> jirka
>