netdev - Re: libbpf distro packaging

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20191220135811.GF17348@krava>
Date:   Fri, 20 Dec 2019 14:58:11 +0100
From:   Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To:     Julia Kartseva <hex@...com>
Cc:     Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...com>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>,
        "labbott@...hat.com" <labbott@...hat.com>,
        "acme@...nel.org" <acme@...nel.org>,
        "debian-kernel@...ts.debian.org" <debian-kernel@...ts.debian.org>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andrey Ignatov <rdna@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
        "jolsa@...nel.org" <jolsa@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        "md@...ux.it" <md@...ux.it>
Subject: Re: libbpf distro packaging

On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 09:37:23PM +0000, Julia Kartseva wrote:
> Hi Jiri,
> 
> 1. v. 0.0.6 is out [1], could you please package it?
> 2. we might need a small spec update due to zlib is made an explicit
> dependency in [2]. zlib should be listed in BuildRequires: section of the
> spec so it's consistent with libbpf.pc

sure, it's ok for rawhide, in fedora 31/30 we still don't have
latest headers packaged

> 3. Do you plan to address the bug report [3] for CentOS? Namely rebuilding
> Fedora's RPM and publishing to EPEL repo?

I did not get any answers on who would do that internally,
so I'm afreaid I'll have to do it, but let me ask again first ;-)

jirka