lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2019 10:01:22 -0800 From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com> To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>, Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@...hat.com>, Murali Karicheri <m-karicheri2@...com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>, Wingman Kwok <w-kwok2@...com> Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 net-next 06/11] net: Introduce a new MII time stamping interface. On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 04:33:59PM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote: > The Marvell PHY datasheets indicate they support PTP. I've not looked > at how they implement it, and if the current model will work. IIRC, those parts time stamp on the MII bus input, and not in the PHY itself, and so they offer no advantage over MAC time stamping. I suspect that is why there has been so little interest. Thanks, Richard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists