[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALx6S37d=JYSSjCfWa_N=AK3HUMSR9TJEv46tLTK-LiMrzoWMg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2019 11:23:24 -0800
From: Tom Herbert <tom@...bertland.com>
To: Prashant Bhole <prashantbhole.linux@...il.com>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
Toshiaki Makita <toshiaki.makita1@...il.com>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 net-next 00/12] XDP in tx path
Prashant,
Can you provide some more detail about the expected use cases. I am
particularly interested if the intent is to set an XDP-like eBPF hook
in the generic TX path (the examples provided seem limited to
tunnels). For instance, is there an intent to send packets on a device
without ever creating a skbuf as the analogue of how XDP can receive
packets without needing skb.
Tom
On Wed, Dec 25, 2019 at 6:33 PM Prashant Bhole
<prashantbhole.linux@...il.com> wrote:
>
> v2:
> - New XDP attachment type: Jesper, Toke and Alexei discussed whether
> to introduce a new program type. Since this set adds a way to attach
> regular XDP program to the tx path, as per Alexei's suggestion, a
> new attachment type BPF_XDP_EGRESS is introduced.
>
> - libbpf API changes:
> Alexei had suggested _opts() style of API extension. Considering it
> two new libbpf APIs are introduced which are equivalent to existing
> APIs. New ones can be extended easily. Please see individual patches
> for details. xdp1 sample program is modified to use new APIs.
>
> - tun: Some patches from previous set are removed as they are
> irrelevant in this series. They will in introduced later.
>
>
> This series introduces new XDP attachment type BPF_XDP_EGRESS to run
> an XDP program in tx path. The idea is to emulate RX path XDP of the
> peer interface. Such program will not have access to rxq info.
>
> RFC also includes its usage in tun driver.
> Later it can be posted separately. Another possible use of this
> feature can be in veth driver. It can improve container networking
> where veth pair links the host and the container. Host can set ACL by
> setting tx path XDP to the veth interface.
>
> It was originally a part of Jason Wang's work "XDP offload with
> virtio-net" [1]. In order to simplify this work we decided to split
> it and introduce tx path XDP separately in this set.
>
> The performance improvment can be seen when an XDP program is attached
> to tun tx path opposed to rx path in the guest.
>
> * Case 1: When packets are XDP_REDIRECT'ed towards tun.
>
> virtio-net rx XDP tun tx XDP
> xdp1(XDP_DROP) 2.57 Mpps 12.90 Mpps
> xdp2(XDP_TX) 1.53 Mpps 7.15 Mpps
>
> * Case 2: When packets are pass through bridge towards tun
>
> virtio-net rx XDP tun tx XDP
> xdp1(XDP_DROP) 0.99 Mpps 1.00 Mpps
> xdp2(XDP_TX) 1.19 Mpps 0.97 Mpps
>
> Since this set modifies tun and vhost_net, below are the netperf
> performance numbers.
>
> Netperf_test Before After Difference
> UDP_STREAM 18byte 90.14 88.77 -1.51%
> UDP_STREAM 1472byte 6955 6658 -4.27%
> TCP STREAM 9409 9402 -0.07%
> UDP_RR 12658 13030 +2.93%
> TCP_RR 12711 12831 +0.94%
>
> XDP_REDIRECT will be handled later because we need to come up with
> proper way to handle it in tx path.
>
> Patches 1-5 are related to adding tx path XDP support.
> Patches 6-12 implement tx path XDP in tun driver.
>
> [1]: https://netdevconf.info/0x13/session.html?xdp-offload-with-virtio-net
>
>
>
> David Ahern (2):
> net: introduce BPF_XDP_EGRESS attach type for XDP
> tun: set tx path XDP program
>
> Jason Wang (2):
> net: core: rename netif_receive_generic_xdp() to do_generic_xdp_core()
> net: core: export do_xdp_generic_core()
>
> Prashant Bhole (8):
> tools: sync kernel uapi/linux/if_link.h header
> libbpf: api for getting/setting link xdp options
> libbpf: set xdp program in tx path
> samples/bpf: xdp1, add XDP tx support
> tuntap: check tun_msg_ctl type at necessary places
> vhost_net: user tap recvmsg api to access ptr ring
> tuntap: remove usage of ptr ring in vhost_net
> tun: run XDP program in tx path
>
> drivers/net/tap.c | 42 +++---
> drivers/net/tun.c | 220 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> drivers/vhost/net.c | 77 +++++-----
> include/linux/if_tap.h | 5 -
> include/linux/if_tun.h | 23 ++-
> include/linux/netdevice.h | 6 +-
> include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 1 +
> include/uapi/linux/if_link.h | 1 +
> net/core/dev.c | 42 ++++--
> net/core/filter.c | 8 ++
> net/core/rtnetlink.c | 112 ++++++++++++++-
> samples/bpf/xdp1_user.c | 42 ++++--
> tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 1 +
> tools/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h | 2 +
> tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h | 40 ++++++
> tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map | 2 +
> tools/lib/bpf/netlink.c | 113 +++++++++++++--
> 17 files changed, 613 insertions(+), 124 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.21.0
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists