lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1552d426-8070-808b-82a0-7218fef21f54@gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 27 Dec 2019 10:35:38 +0900
From:   Prashant Bhole <prashantbhole.linux@...il.com>
To:     Tom Herbert <tom@...bertland.com>
Cc:     "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
        Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
        David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        Toshiaki Makita <toshiaki.makita1@...il.com>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>,
        Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 net-next 00/12] XDP in tx path



On 12/27/19 4:23 AM, Tom Herbert wrote:
> Prashant,
> 
> Can you provide some more detail about the expected use cases. I am
> particularly interested if the intent is to set an XDP-like eBPF hook
> in the generic TX path (the examples provided seem limited to
> tunnels). For instance, is there an intent to send packets on a device
> without ever creating a skbuf as the analogue of how XDP can receive
> packets without needing skb.

This patchset is a result of trying to solve problems in virtual
devices. It just emulates RX path XDP of peer device. At least I have
not thought about the idea that you mentioned. May be this idea can be
helpful when a separate XDP_TX type of program which will introduced
later.

Toke had pointed out one more use case of TX path XDP here:
https://github.com/xdp-project/xdp-project/blob/master/xdp-project.org#xdp-hook-at-tx

Thanks

> 
> Tom
> 
> On Wed, Dec 25, 2019 at 6:33 PM Prashant Bhole
> <prashantbhole.linux@...il.com> wrote:
>>
>> v2:
>> - New XDP attachment type: Jesper, Toke and Alexei discussed whether
>>    to introduce a new program type. Since this set adds a way to attach
>>    regular XDP program to the tx path, as per Alexei's suggestion, a
>>    new attachment type BPF_XDP_EGRESS is introduced.
>>
>> - libbpf API changes:
>>    Alexei had suggested _opts() style of API extension. Considering it
>>    two new libbpf APIs are introduced which are equivalent to existing
>>    APIs. New ones can be extended easily. Please see individual patches
>>    for details. xdp1 sample program is modified to use new APIs.
>>
>> - tun: Some patches from previous set are removed as they are
>>    irrelevant in this series. They will in introduced later.
>>
>>
>> This series introduces new XDP attachment type BPF_XDP_EGRESS to run
>> an XDP program in tx path. The idea is to emulate RX path XDP of the
>> peer interface. Such program will not have access to rxq info.
>>
>> RFC also includes its usage in tun driver.
>> Later it can be posted separately. Another possible use of this
>> feature can be in veth driver. It can improve container networking
>> where veth pair links the host and the container. Host can set ACL by
>> setting tx path XDP to the veth interface.
>>
>> It was originally a part of Jason Wang's work "XDP offload with
>> virtio-net" [1]. In order to simplify this work we decided to split
>> it and introduce tx path XDP separately in this set.
>>
>> The performance improvment can be seen when an XDP program is attached
>> to tun tx path opposed to rx path in the guest.
>>
>> * Case 1: When packets are XDP_REDIRECT'ed towards tun.
>>
>>                       virtio-net rx XDP      tun tx XDP
>>    xdp1(XDP_DROP)        2.57 Mpps           12.90 Mpps
>>    xdp2(XDP_TX)          1.53 Mpps            7.15 Mpps
>>
>> * Case 2: When packets are pass through bridge towards tun
>>
>>                       virtio-net rx XDP      tun tx XDP
>>    xdp1(XDP_DROP)        0.99 Mpps           1.00 Mpps
>>    xdp2(XDP_TX)          1.19 Mpps           0.97 Mpps
>>
>> Since this set modifies tun and vhost_net, below are the netperf
>> performance numbers.
>>
>>      Netperf_test       Before      After   Difference
>>    UDP_STREAM 18byte     90.14       88.77    -1.51%
>>    UDP_STREAM 1472byte   6955        6658     -4.27%
>>    TCP STREAM            9409        9402     -0.07%
>>    UDP_RR                12658       13030    +2.93%
>>    TCP_RR                12711       12831    +0.94%
>>
>> XDP_REDIRECT will be handled later because we need to come up with
>> proper way to handle it in tx path.
>>
>> Patches 1-5 are related to adding tx path XDP support.
>> Patches 6-12 implement tx path XDP in tun driver.
>>
>> [1]: https://netdevconf.info/0x13/session.html?xdp-offload-with-virtio-net
>>
>>
>>
>> David Ahern (2):
>>    net: introduce BPF_XDP_EGRESS attach type for XDP
>>    tun: set tx path XDP program
>>
>> Jason Wang (2):
>>    net: core: rename netif_receive_generic_xdp() to do_generic_xdp_core()
>>    net: core: export do_xdp_generic_core()
>>
>> Prashant Bhole (8):
>>    tools: sync kernel uapi/linux/if_link.h header
>>    libbpf: api for getting/setting link xdp options
>>    libbpf: set xdp program in tx path
>>    samples/bpf: xdp1, add XDP tx support
>>    tuntap: check tun_msg_ctl type at necessary places
>>    vhost_net: user tap recvmsg api to access ptr ring
>>    tuntap: remove usage of ptr ring in vhost_net
>>    tun: run XDP program in tx path
>>
>>   drivers/net/tap.c                  |  42 +++---
>>   drivers/net/tun.c                  | 220 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>>   drivers/vhost/net.c                |  77 +++++-----
>>   include/linux/if_tap.h             |   5 -
>>   include/linux/if_tun.h             |  23 ++-
>>   include/linux/netdevice.h          |   6 +-
>>   include/uapi/linux/bpf.h           |   1 +
>>   include/uapi/linux/if_link.h       |   1 +
>>   net/core/dev.c                     |  42 ++++--
>>   net/core/filter.c                  |   8 ++
>>   net/core/rtnetlink.c               | 112 ++++++++++++++-
>>   samples/bpf/xdp1_user.c            |  42 ++++--
>>   tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h     |   1 +
>>   tools/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h |   2 +
>>   tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h             |  40 ++++++
>>   tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map           |   2 +
>>   tools/lib/bpf/netlink.c            | 113 +++++++++++++--
>>   17 files changed, 613 insertions(+), 124 deletions(-)
>>
>> --
>> 2.21.0
>>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ