netdev - Re: [PATCH iproute2-next] taprio: Add support for the SetAndHold and SetAndRelease commands

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 30 Dec 2019 21:30:54 -0700
From:   David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To:     Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@...el.com>,
        Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Joao Pinto <Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com>,
        David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH iproute2-next] taprio: Add support for the SetAndHold and
 SetAndRelease commands

On 12/18/19 4:05 PM, Vinicius Costa Gomes wrote:
> Hi Jose,
> 
> Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com> writes:
> 
>> Although this is already in kernel, currently the tool does not support
>> them. We need these commands for full TSN features which are currently
>> supported in Synopsys IPs such as QoS and XGMAC3.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com>
> 
> This patch looks good in itself. 
> 
> However, I feel that this is incomplete. At least the way I understand
> things, without specifying which traffic classes are going to be
> preemptible (or it's dual concept, express), I don't see how this is
> going to be used in practice. Or does the hardware have a default
> configuration, that all traffic classes are preemptible, for example.
> 
> What am I missing here?
> 

this patch has been lingering for a while. What's the status? good
enough for commit or are changes needed?