[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+h21hqEnFjPHyK9ZanzwXdvkcdTA3uZzJMf0eo0FZWRTFzouw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2020 23:28:47 +0200
From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexander Lobakin <alobakin@...nk.ru>,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@...ke-m.de>,
Woojung Huh <woojung.huh@...rochip.com>,
Microchip Linux Driver Support <UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>,
Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>,
Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>,
Petar Penkov <ppenkov@...gle.com>,
Matteo Croce <mcroce@...hat.com>,
Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@...udflare.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Paul Blakey <paulb@...lanox.com>,
Yoshiki Komachi <komachi.yoshiki@...il.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: dsa: Remove indirect function call for flow dissection
On Fri, 3 Jan 2020 at 22:50, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com> wrote:
>
> The call path is the following on TX (e.g.: when you run a DHCP client),
Oh, it gets called on TX too, ok.
In that case, static proto_off information won't work for asymmetric
taggers such as ocelot which may have an independently configurable
prefix length on RX and TX.
I want to get rid of the RX tag prefix in ocelot though, but just saying.
> I don't think your formula works for EDSA which has an EtherType, but
Why doesn't it work with edsa?
> this would probably work for all tags we currently support except trailer.
>
> proto = (__be16 *)(skb->data)[overhead / 2 - 1];
>
I wasn't suggesting to do this exact calculation in flow_dissector.c,
but rather to pre-populate proto_off with a value statically derived
from it on a piece of paper, with the trailer exception where it would
be -2 in bytes or -1 in shorts, but nonetheless a negative and valid
value.
>
> I don't think anyone except Alexander did serious investigation this.
> For now, what I am interested in is reducing the amount of technical
> debt and expensive function calls.
Does the change bring any measurable improvement?
> --
> Florian
Regards,
-Vladimir
Powered by blists - more mailing lists