[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <OSBPR01MB3784EF710275E56AC20B1AEC8E3C0@OSBPR01MB3784.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2020 07:45:33 +0000
From: "mizuta.takeshi@...itsu.com" <mizuta.takeshi@...itsu.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
CC: "'netdev@...r.kernel.org'" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"'davem@...emloft.net'" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: RE: [PATCH iproute2 v5 1/2] ip-xfrm: Fix getprotobynumber() result to
be print for each call.
Hi, Hemminger,
Thank you for your comment.
> These two patches do not apply to current git version of iproute2.
Does this mean that these patches are not applied to iproute2 v5?
If these patches are created for iproute2-next, will they be applied?
I'm sorry, but please tell me the meaning of your comment.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: netdev-owner@...r.kernel.org <netdev-owner@...r.kernel.org> On Behalf Of Stephen
> Hemminger
> Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2019 1:47 PM
> To: Mizuta, Takeshi/水田 健司 <mizuta.takeshi@...itsu.com>
> Cc: 'netdev@...r.kernel.org' <netdev@...r.kernel.org>; 'davem@...emloft.net'
> <davem@...emloft.net>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH iproute2 v5 1/2] ip-xfrm: Fix getprotobynumber() result to be print for
> each call.
>
> On Mon, 16 Dec 2019 04:01:03 +0000
> "mizuta.takeshi@...itsu.com" <mizuta.takeshi@...itsu.com> wrote:
>
> > Running "ip xfrm state help" shows wrong protocol.
> >
> > $ ip xfrm state help
> > <snip>
> > UPSPEC := proto { { tcp | tcp | tcp | tcp } [ sport PORT ] [ dport PORT ] |
> > { icmp | icmp | icmp } [ type NUMBER ] [ code NUMBER ] |
> >
> > In order to get the character string from the protocol number, getprotobynumber(3) is called.
> > However, since the address obtained by getprotobynumber(3) is static,
> > it is necessary to print a character string each time getprotobynumber(3) is called.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: MIZUTA Takeshi <mizuta.takeshi@...itsu.com>
>
> These two patches do not apply to current git version of iproute2.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists