lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 09 Jan 2020 09:50:53 +0100
From:   Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>
To:     Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        "davem\@davemloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     "daniel\@iogearbox.net" <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        "netdev\@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "bpf\@vger.kernel.org" <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
        Kernel Team <Kernel-team@...com>,
        Tom Stellard <tstellar@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 2/6] libbpf: Collect static vs global info about functions

Yonghong Song <yhs@...com> writes:

> On 1/8/20 2:25 AM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>> Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org> writes:
>> 
>>> Collect static vs global information about BPF functions from ELF file and
>>> improve BTF with this additional info if llvm is too old and doesn't emit it on
>>> its own.
>> 
>> Has the support for this actually landed in LLVM yet? I tried grep'ing
>> in the commit log and couldn't find anything...
>
> It has not landed yet. The commit link is:
>     https://reviews.llvm.org/D71638
>
> I will try to land the patch in the next couple of days once this series
> of patch is merged or the principle of the patch is accepted.

OK. My next question was going to be whether you're planning to get this
into LLVM master before the cutoff date for LLVM10, but I see Alexei
already answered that in the other reply, so great!

-Toke

Powered by blists - more mailing lists