netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf-next 3/6] bpf: Introduce function-by-function verification

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAADnVQLrvMm35VwTsf-+TFFbimZEFm15kCFrUW2=hySXGEiRPw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 8 Jan 2020 15:05:39 -0800
From:   Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To:     Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Cc:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, Kernel Team <kernel-team@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 3/6] bpf: Introduce function-by-function verification

On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 11:27 PM Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org> wrote:
> +       if (subprog) {
> +               ret = btf_prepare_func_args(env, subprog, regs);
> +               if (ret)
> +                       return ret;

noticed a memory leak here.
Will respin with all comments addressed soon.