netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] mlx4: Bump up MAX

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMGffEntn9nQAUk5ejEiEfnSjGda20rqQVi-zNu+GFr3v39pAA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 13 Jan 2020 09:47:59 +0100
From:   Jinpu Wang <jinpu.wang@...ud.ionos.com>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kubakici@...pl>
Cc:     Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@...il.com>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, tariqt@...lanox.com,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, kernel-team@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] mlx4: Bump up MAX_MSIX from 64 to 128

On Sun, Jan 12, 2020 at 9:51 PM Jakub Kicinski <kubakici@...pl> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 9 Jan 2020 11:23:17 -0800, Jonathan Lemon wrote:
> > On modern hardware with a large number of cpus and using XDP,
> > the current MSIX limit is insufficient.  Bump the limit in
> > order to allow more queues.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@...il.com>
>
> Applied to net-next, thanks everyone!
>
> (Jack, please make sure you spell your tags right)
Checked, It's correct both in my reply and in net-next.git.

Thanks,
Jack Wang