netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] mlx4: Bump up MAX

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 13 Jan 2020 03:20:30 -0800
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kubakici@...pl>
To:     Jinpu Wang <jinpu.wang@...ud.ionos.com>
Cc:     Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@...il.com>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, tariqt@...lanox.com,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, kernel-team@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] mlx4: Bump up MAX_MSIX from 64 to 128

On Mon, 13 Jan 2020 09:47:59 +0100, Jinpu Wang wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 12, 2020 at 9:51 PM Jakub Kicinski <kubakici@...pl> wrote:
> > On Thu, 9 Jan 2020 11:23:17 -0800, Jonathan Lemon wrote:  
> > > On modern hardware with a large number of cpus and using XDP,
> > > the current MSIX limit is insufficient.  Bump the limit in
> > > order to allow more queues.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@...il.com>  
> >
> > Applied to net-next, thanks everyone!
> >
> > (Jack, please make sure you spell your tags right)  
> Checked, It's correct both in my reply and in net-next.git.

I manually corrected it in tree. You swapped 'i' and 'e' 
in the word reviewed, your email had "reveiwed".