[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200113123728.GA120834@krava>
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2020 13:37:28 +0100
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...el.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>,
Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>, Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>,
David Miller <davem@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] bpf: Allow to resolve bpf trampoline in unwind
On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 01:31:38PM +0100, Björn Töpel wrote:
> On 2020-01-13 13:21, Björn Töpel wrote:
> >
> > On 2020-01-13 10:43, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > > hi,
> > > attached patch seems to work for me (trampoline usecase), but I
> > > don't know
> > > how to test it for dispatcher.. also I need to check if we need to
> > > decrease
> > > BPF_TRAMP_MAX or BPF_DISPATCHER_MAX, it might take more time;-)
> > >
> >
> > Thanks for working on it! I'll take the patch for a spin.
> >
> > To test the dispatcher, just run XDP!
> >
> > With your change, the BPF_DISPATCHER_MAX is still valid. 48 entries =>
> > 1890B which is < (BPF_IMAGE_SIZE / 2).
great
> >
>
> ...and FWIW, it would be nice with bpf_dispatcher_<...> entries in kallsyms
ok so it'd be 'bpf_dispatcher_<name>'
from DEFINE_BPF_DISPATCHER(name)
> as well. If that code could be shared with the trampoline code as well
> (bpf_trampoline_<btf_id>), that'd be great!
>
ok, will add it
thanks,
jirka
Powered by blists - more mailing lists