netdev - Re: [PATCH 5/5] bpf: Allow to resolve bpf trampoline in unwind

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 13 Jan 2020 13:31:38 +0100
From:   Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...el.com>
To:     Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc:     Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        bpf@...r.kernel.org, Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>,
        Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>, Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>,
        David Miller <davem@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] bpf: Allow to resolve bpf trampoline in unwind

On 2020-01-13 13:21, Björn Töpel wrote:
> 
> On 2020-01-13 10:43, Jiri Olsa wrote:
>> hi,
>> attached patch seems to work for me (trampoline usecase), but I don't 
>> know
>> how to test it for dispatcher.. also I need to check if we need to 
>> decrease
>> BPF_TRAMP_MAX or BPF_DISPATCHER_MAX, it might take more time;-)
>>
> 
> Thanks for working on it! I'll take the patch for a spin.
> 
> To test the dispatcher, just run XDP!
> 
> With your change, the BPF_DISPATCHER_MAX is still valid. 48 entries =>
> 1890B which is < (BPF_IMAGE_SIZE / 2).
>

...and FWIW, it would be nice with bpf_dispatcher_<...> entries in 
kallsyms as well. If that code could be shared with the trampoline code 
as well (bpf_trampoline_<btf_id>), that'd be great!