netdev - [PATCH bpf] selftests/bpf: skip perf hw events test if the setup disabled it

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200117100656.10359-1-liuhangbin@gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 17 Jan 2020 18:06:56 +0800
From:   Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
To:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf] selftests/bpf: skip perf hw events test if the setup disabled it

The same with commit 4e59afbbed96 ("selftests/bpf: skip nmi test when perf
hw events are disabled"), it would make more sense to skip the
test_stacktrace_build_id_nmi test if the setup (e.g. virtual machines) has
disabled hardware perf events.

Fixes: 13790d1cc72c ("bpf: add selftest for stackmap with build_id in NMI context")
Signed-off-by: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/stacktrace_build_id_nmi.c    | 8 ++++++--
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/stacktrace_build_id_nmi.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/stacktrace_build_id_nmi.c
index f62aa0eb959b..437cb93e72ac 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/stacktrace_build_id_nmi.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/stacktrace_build_id_nmi.c
@@ -49,8 +49,12 @@ void test_stacktrace_build_id_nmi(void)
 	pmu_fd = syscall(__NR_perf_event_open, &attr, -1 /* pid */,
 			 0 /* cpu 0 */, -1 /* group id */,
 			 0 /* flags */);
-	if (CHECK(pmu_fd < 0, "perf_event_open",
-		  "err %d errno %d. Does the test host support PERF_COUNT_HW_CPU_CYCLES?\n",
+	if (pmu_fd < 0 && errno == ENOENT) {
+		printf("%s:SKIP:no PERF_COUNT_HW_CPU_CYCLES\n", __func__);
+		test__skip();
+		goto close_prog;
+	}
+	if (CHECK(pmu_fd < 0, "perf_event_open", "err %d errno %d\n",
 		  pmu_fd, errno))
 		goto close_prog;
 
-- 
2.19.2