[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHv+uoEYa=xNQDLz+-fxnSReSLYX8-ELY8wi4u9Gaa8Qm3h=4w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2020 13:12:09 +0530
From: Leslie Monis <lesliemonis@...il.com>
To: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Cc: Linux NetDev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tc: parse attributes with NLA_F_NESTED flag
On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 3:31 AM David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On 1/16/20 8:57 AM, Leslie Monis wrote:
>
> > diff --git a/tc/tc_class.c b/tc/tc_class.c
> > index c7e3cfdf..39bea971 100644
> > --- a/tc/tc_class.c
> > +++ b/tc/tc_class.c
> > @@ -246,8 +246,8 @@ static void graph_cls_show(FILE *fp, char *buf, struct hlist_head *root_list,
> > "+---(%s)", cls_id_str);
> > strcat(buf, str);
> >
> > - parse_rtattr(tb, TCA_MAX, (struct rtattr *)cls->data,
> > - cls->data_len);
> > + parse_rtattr_flags(tb, TCA_MAX, (struct rtattr *)cls->data,
> > + cls->data_len, NLA_F_NESTED);
>
> Petr recently sent a patch to update parse_rtattr_nested to add the
> NESTED flag. Can you update this patch to use parse_rtattr_nested?
Yes, will do.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists