lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 20 Jan 2020 23:16:15 +0100
From:   Daniel Borkmann <>
To:     Stanislav Fomichev <>,,
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: don't check for btf fd in

On 1/18/20 2:05 AM, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> After commit 0d13bfce023a ("libbpf: Don't require root for
> bpf_object__open()") we no longer load BTF during bpf_object__open(),
> so let's remove the expectation from test_btf that the fd is not -1.
> The test currently fails.
> Before:
> BTF libbpf test[1] (test_btf_haskv.o): do_test_file:4152:FAIL bpf_object__btf_fd: -1
> BTF libbpf test[2] (test_btf_newkv.o): do_test_file:4152:FAIL bpf_object__btf_fd: -1
> BTF libbpf test[3] (test_btf_nokv.o): do_test_file:4152:FAIL bpf_object__btf_fd: -1
> After:
> BTF libbpf test[1] (test_btf_haskv.o): OK
> BTF libbpf test[2] (test_btf_newkv.o): OK
> BTF libbpf test[3] (test_btf_nokv.o): OK
> Fixes: 0d13bfce023a ("libbpf: Don't require root forbpf_object__open()")
> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <>

Applied, thanks!

Powered by blists - more mailing lists