| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <e2a6aeb5-b495-7ed5-0395-bf3f78abd05f@iogearbox.net>
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 23:41:06 +0100
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>, bpf@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, kernel-team@...com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 1/3] bpf: Add BPF_FUNC_jiffies64
On 1/21/20 8:54 PM, Martin KaFai Lau wrote:
> This patch adds a helper to read the 64bit jiffies. It will be used
> in a later patch to implement the bpf_cubic.c.
>
> The helper is inlined. "gen_inline" is added to "struct bpf_func_proto"
> to do that. This helper is available to CAP_SYS_ADMIN.
>
> Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
> ---
> include/linux/bpf.h | 2 ++
> include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 9 ++++++++-
> kernel/bpf/core.c | 1 +
> kernel/bpf/helpers.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> net/core/filter.c | 2 ++
> 6 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
> index 8e3b8f4ad183..3d85ef44b247 100644
> --- a/include/linux/bpf.h
> +++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
> @@ -258,6 +258,7 @@ enum bpf_return_type {
> */
> struct bpf_func_proto {
> u64 (*func)(u64 r1, u64 r2, u64 r3, u64 r4, u64 r5);
> + u32 (*gen_inline)(struct bpf_insn *insn_buf);
> bool gpl_only;
> bool pkt_access;
> enum bpf_return_type ret_type;
> @@ -1406,6 +1407,7 @@ extern const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_get_local_storage_proto;
> extern const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_strtol_proto;
> extern const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_strtoul_proto;
> extern const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_tcp_sock_proto;
> +extern const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_jiffies64_proto;
>
> /* Shared helpers among cBPF and eBPF. */
> void bpf_user_rnd_init_once(void);
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> index 033d90a2282d..d17c6bcd50cd 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> @@ -2885,6 +2885,12 @@ union bpf_attr {
> * **-EPERM** if no permission to send the *sig*.
> *
> * **-EAGAIN** if bpf program can try again.
> + *
> + * u64 bpf_jiffies64(void)
> + * Description
> + * Obtain the 64bit jiffies
> + * Return
> + * The 64 bit jiffies
> */
> #define __BPF_FUNC_MAPPER(FN) \
> FN(unspec), \
> @@ -3004,7 +3010,8 @@ union bpf_attr {
> FN(probe_read_user_str), \
> FN(probe_read_kernel_str), \
> FN(tcp_send_ack), \
> - FN(send_signal_thread),
> + FN(send_signal_thread), \
> + FN(jiffies64),
>
> /* integer value in 'imm' field of BPF_CALL instruction selects which helper
> * function eBPF program intends to call
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/core.c b/kernel/bpf/core.c
> index 29d47aae0dd1..973a20d49749 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/core.c
> @@ -2137,6 +2137,7 @@ const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_map_pop_elem_proto __weak;
> const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_map_peek_elem_proto __weak;
> const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_spin_lock_proto __weak;
> const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_spin_unlock_proto __weak;
> +const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_jiffies64_proto __weak;
>
> const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_get_prandom_u32_proto __weak;
> const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_get_smp_processor_id_proto __weak;
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
> index cada974c9f4e..b241cfd350c4 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
> #include <linux/uidgid.h>
> #include <linux/filter.h>
> #include <linux/ctype.h>
> +#include <linux/jiffies.h>
>
> #include "../../lib/kstrtox.h"
>
> @@ -312,6 +313,32 @@ void copy_map_value_locked(struct bpf_map *map, void *dst, void *src,
> preempt_enable();
> }
>
> +static u32 bpf_jiffies64_gen_inline(struct bpf_insn *insn_buf)
> +{
> + struct bpf_insn *insn = insn_buf;
> +#if BITS_PER_LONG == 64
> + struct bpf_insn ld_jiffies_addr[2] = {
> + BPF_LD_IMM64(BPF_REG_0, (unsigned long)&jiffies),
> + };
> +
> + BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(jiffies) != sizeof(unsigned long));
> +
> + *insn++ = ld_jiffies_addr[0];
> + *insn++ = ld_jiffies_addr[1];
> + *insn++ = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, 0);
> +#else
> + *insn++ = BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_CAST_CALL(get_jiffies_64));
> +#endif
> +
> + return insn - insn_buf;
> +}
> +
> +const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_jiffies64_proto = {
> + .gen_inline = bpf_jiffies64_gen_inline,
> + .gpl_only = false,
> + .ret_type = RET_INTEGER,
> +};
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_CGROUPS
> BPF_CALL_0(bpf_get_current_cgroup_id)
> {
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> index ca17dccc17ba..91818aad2f80 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> @@ -9447,6 +9447,24 @@ static int fixup_bpf_calls(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
>
> patch_call_imm:
> fn = env->ops->get_func_proto(insn->imm, env->prog);
> + if (fn->gen_inline) {
> + cnt = fn->gen_inline(insn_buf);
> + if (cnt == 0 || cnt >= ARRAY_SIZE(insn_buf)) {
> + verbose(env, "bpf verifier is misconfigured\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + new_prog = bpf_patch_insn_data(env, i + delta,
> + insn_buf, cnt);
> + if (!new_prog)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + delta += cnt - 1;
> + env->prog = prog = new_prog;
> + insn = new_prog->insnsi + i + delta;
> + continue;
> + }
We do most of the inlining in fixup_bpf_calls() directly today, why
breaking with that here with a special callback? (Agree it could probably
be refactored in general, but such rework should also take the other
helpers into account.)
> /* all functions that have prototype and verifier allowed
> * programs to call them, must be real in-kernel functions
> */
> diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c
> index 17de6747d9e3..4bf3e4aa8a7a 100644
> --- a/net/core/filter.c
> +++ b/net/core/filter.c
> @@ -5923,6 +5923,8 @@ bpf_base_func_proto(enum bpf_func_id func_id)
> return &bpf_spin_unlock_proto;
> case BPF_FUNC_trace_printk:
> return bpf_get_trace_printk_proto();
> + case BPF_FUNC_jiffies64:
> + return &bpf_jiffies64_proto;
> default:
> return NULL;
> }
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists