[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200123082542.06ed0a53@hermes.lan>
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2020 08:25:42 -0800
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, roopa@...ulusnetworks.com,
davem@...emloft.net, bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/4] net: bridge: check port state before
br_allowed_egress
On Thu, 23 Jan 2020 15:28:04 +0200
Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com> wrote:
> return ((p->flags & BR_HAIRPIN_MODE) || skb->dev != p->dev) &&
> - br_allowed_egress(vg, skb) && p->state == BR_STATE_FORWARDING &&
> + p->state == BR_STATE_FORWARDING && br_allowed_egress(vg, skb) &&
> nbp_switchdev_allowed_egress(p, skb) &&
> !br_skb_isolated(p, skb);
> }
Maybe break this complex return for readability?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists