lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 24 Jan 2020 22:36:11 +0900
From:   Prashant Bhole <bholeprashant.oss@...il.com>
To:     "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
        David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, jasowang@...hat.com, davem@...emloft.net,
        jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com, jbrouer@...hat.com, toke@...hat.com,
        toshiaki.makita1@...il.com, daniel@...earbox.net,
        john.fastabend@...il.com, ast@...nel.org, kafai@...com,
        songliubraving@...com, yhs@...com, andriin@...com,
        dsahern@...il.com, Prashant Bhole <prashantbhole.linux@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 10/12] tun: run XDP program in tx path



On 1/23/2020 5:23 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 06:42:08PM -0700, David Ahern wrote:
>> From: Prashant Bhole <prashantbhole.linux@...il.com>
>>
>> Run the XDP program as soon as packet is removed from the ptr
>> ring. Since this is XDP in tx path, the traditional handling of
>> XDP actions XDP_TX/REDIRECT isn't valid. For this reason we call
>> do_xdp_generic_core instead of do_xdp_generic. do_xdp_generic_core
>> just runs the program and leaves the action handling to us.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Prashant Bhole <prashantbhole.linux@...il.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/net/tun.c | 153 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>   1 file changed, 150 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/tun.c b/drivers/net/tun.c
>> index b6bac773f2a0..71bcd4ec2571 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/tun.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/tun.c
>> @@ -130,6 +130,7 @@ struct tap_filter {
>>   /* MAX_TAP_QUEUES 256 is chosen to allow rx/tx queues to be equal
>>    * to max number of VCPUs in guest. */
>>   #define MAX_TAP_QUEUES 256
>> +#define MAX_TAP_BATCH 64
>>   #define MAX_TAP_FLOWS  4096
>>   
>>   #define TUN_FLOW_EXPIRE (3 * HZ)
>> @@ -175,6 +176,7 @@ struct tun_file {
>>   	struct tun_struct *detached;
>>   	struct ptr_ring tx_ring;
>>   	struct xdp_rxq_info xdp_rxq;
>> +	void *pkt_ptrs[MAX_TAP_BATCH];
>>   };
>>   
>>   struct tun_page {
>> @@ -2140,6 +2142,107 @@ static ssize_t tun_put_user(struct tun_struct *tun,
>>   	return total;
>>   }
>>   
>> +static struct sk_buff *tun_prepare_xdp_skb(struct sk_buff *skb)
>> +{
>> +	struct sk_buff *nskb;
>> +
>> +	if (skb_shared(skb) || skb_cloned(skb)) {
>> +		nskb = skb_copy(skb, GFP_ATOMIC);
>> +		consume_skb(skb);
>> +		return nskb;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return skb;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static u32 tun_do_xdp_tx_generic(struct tun_struct *tun,
>> +				 struct sk_buff *skb)
>> +{
>> +	struct bpf_prog *xdp_prog;
>> +	struct xdp_buff xdp;
>> +	u32 act = XDP_PASS;
>> +
>> +	xdp_prog = rcu_dereference(tun->xdp_egress_prog);
>> +	if (xdp_prog) {
>> +		skb = tun_prepare_xdp_skb(skb);
>> +		if (!skb) {
>> +			act = XDP_DROP;
>> +			kfree_skb(skb);
>> +			goto drop;
>> +		}
>> +
>> +		act = do_xdp_generic_core(skb, &xdp, xdp_prog);
>> +		switch (act) {
>> +		case XDP_TX:
>> +			/* Rx path generic XDP will be called in this path
>> +			 */
>> +			local_bh_disable();
>> +			netif_receive_skb(skb);
>> +			local_bh_enable();
>> +			break;
>> +		case XDP_PASS:
>> +			break;
>> +		case XDP_REDIRECT:
>> +			/* Since we are not handling this case yet, let's free
>> +			 * skb here. In case of XDP_DROP/XDP_ABORTED, the skb
>> +			 * was already freed in do_xdp_generic_core()
>> +			 */
>> +			kfree_skb(skb);
>> +			/* fall through */
>> +		default:
>> +			bpf_warn_invalid_xdp_action(act);
>> +			/* fall through */
>> +		case XDP_ABORTED:
>> +			trace_xdp_exception(tun->dev, xdp_prog, act);
>> +			/* fall through */
>> +		case XDP_DROP:
>> +			goto drop;
>> +		}
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return act;
>> +drop:
>> +	this_cpu_inc(tun->pcpu_stats->tx_dropped);
>> +	return act;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static u32 tun_do_xdp_tx(struct tun_struct *tun, struct tun_file *tfile,
>> +			 struct xdp_frame *frame)
>> +{
>> +	struct bpf_prog *xdp_prog;
>> +	struct xdp_buff xdp;
>> +	u32 act = XDP_PASS;
>> +
>> +	xdp_prog = rcu_dereference(tun->xdp_egress_prog);
>> +	if (xdp_prog) {
>> +		xdp.data_hard_start = frame->data - frame->headroom;
>> +		xdp.data = frame->data;
>> +		xdp.data_end = xdp.data + frame->len;
>> +		xdp.data_meta = xdp.data - frame->metasize;
>> +
>> +		act = bpf_prog_run_xdp(xdp_prog, &xdp);
>> +		switch (act) {
>> +		case XDP_PASS:
>> +			break;
>> +		case XDP_TX:
>> +			/* fall through */
>> +		case XDP_REDIRECT:
>> +			/* fall through */
>> +		default:
>> +			bpf_warn_invalid_xdp_action(act);
>> +			/* fall through */
>> +		case XDP_ABORTED:
>> +			trace_xdp_exception(tun->dev, xdp_prog, act);
>> +			/* fall through */
>> +		case XDP_DROP:
>> +			xdp_return_frame_rx_napi(frame);
>> +			break;
>> +		}
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return act;
>> +}
>> +
>>   static void *tun_ring_recv(struct tun_file *tfile, int noblock, int *err)
>>   {
>>   	DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(wait, current);
>> @@ -2557,6 +2660,52 @@ static int tun_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *m, size_t total_len)
>>   	return ret;
>>   }
>>   
>> +static int tun_consume_packets(struct tun_file *tfile, void **ptr_array, int n)
>> +{
>> +	void **pkts = tfile->pkt_ptrs;
>> +	struct xdp_frame *frame;
>> +	struct tun_struct *tun;
>> +	int i, num_ptrs;
>> +	int pkt_cnt = 0;
>> +	void *ptr;
>> +	u32 act;
>> +	int batchsz;
>> +
>> +	if (unlikely(!tfile))
>> +		return 0;
>> +
>> +	rcu_read_lock();
>> +	tun = rcu_dereference(tfile->tun);
>> +	if (unlikely(!tun)) {
>> +		rcu_read_unlock();
>> +		return 0;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	while (n) {
>> +		batchsz = (n > MAX_TAP_BATCH) ? MAX_TAP_BATCH : n;
>> +		n -= batchsz;
>> +		num_ptrs = ptr_ring_consume_batched(&tfile->tx_ring, pkts,
>> +						    batchsz);
>> +		if (!num_ptrs)
>> +			break;
> 
> Can't we avoid looping over the packets in the current case
> where there are no xdp programs at all?

That's doable. Thanks.

Prashant
> 
> 
>> +		for (i = 0; i < num_ptrs; i++) {
>> +			ptr = pkts[i];
>> +			if (tun_is_xdp_frame(ptr)) {
>> +				frame = tun_ptr_to_xdp(ptr);
>> +				act = tun_do_xdp_tx(tun, tfile, frame);
>> +			} else {
>> +				act = tun_do_xdp_tx_generic(tun, ptr);
>> +			}
>> +
>> +			if (act == XDP_PASS)
>> +				ptr_array[pkt_cnt++] = ptr;
>> +		}
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	rcu_read_unlock();
>> +	return pkt_cnt;
>> +}
>> +
>>   static int tun_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *m, size_t total_len,
>>   		       int flags)
>>   {
>> @@ -2577,9 +2726,7 @@ static int tun_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *m, size_t total_len,
>>   			ptr = ctl->ptr;
>>   			break;
>>   		case TUN_MSG_CONSUME_PKTS:
>> -			ret = ptr_ring_consume_batched(&tfile->tx_ring,
>> -						       ctl->ptr,
>> -						       ctl->num);
>> +			ret = tun_consume_packets(tfile, ctl->ptr, ctl->num);
>>   			goto out;
>>   		case TUN_MSG_UNCONSUME_PKTS:
>>   			ptr_ring_unconsume(&tfile->tx_ring, ctl->ptr,
>> -- 
>> 2.21.1 (Apple Git-122.3)
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ