[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200125210550.GH18311@lunn.ch>
Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2020 22:05:50 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Aya Levin <ayal@...lanox.com>,
Eran Ben Elisha <eranbe@...lanox.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [net-next V2 11/14] ethtool: Add support for low latency RS FEC
On Sat, Jan 25, 2020 at 11:40:37AM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Jan 2020 05:11:52 +0000, Saeed Mahameed wrote:
> > From: Aya Levin <ayal@...lanox.com>
> >
> > Add support for low latency Reed Solomon FEC as LLRS.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Aya Levin <ayal@...lanox.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Eran Ben Elisha <eranbe@...lanox.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
>
> This is kind of buried in the midst of the driver patches.
> It'd preferably be a small series of its own.
> Let's at least try to CC PHY folk now.
Thanks Jakuv
> Is this from some standard?
A reference would be good.
I assume the existing ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_FEC_RS_BIT is for Clause 91.
What clause does this LLRS refer to?
Thanks
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists