lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2020 22:05:50 +0100 From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> Cc: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Aya Levin <ayal@...lanox.com>, Eran Ben Elisha <eranbe@...lanox.com>, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>, Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@...e.cz> Subject: Re: [net-next V2 11/14] ethtool: Add support for low latency RS FEC On Sat, Jan 25, 2020 at 11:40:37AM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Sat, 25 Jan 2020 05:11:52 +0000, Saeed Mahameed wrote: > > From: Aya Levin <ayal@...lanox.com> > > > > Add support for low latency Reed Solomon FEC as LLRS. > > > > Signed-off-by: Aya Levin <ayal@...lanox.com> > > Reviewed-by: Eran Ben Elisha <eranbe@...lanox.com> > > Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com> > > This is kind of buried in the midst of the driver patches. > It'd preferably be a small series of its own. > Let's at least try to CC PHY folk now. Thanks Jakuv > Is this from some standard? A reference would be good. I assume the existing ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_FEC_RS_BIT is for Clause 91. What clause does this LLRS refer to? Thanks Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists