netdev - Re: [PATCH net] xfrm: Interpret XFRM_INF as 32 bit value for non-ESN states

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 30 Jan 2020 12:52:58 +0100
From:   Thomas Egerer <thomas.egerer@...unet.com>
To:     Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
CC:     <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] xfrm: Interpret XFRM_INF as 32 bit value for non-ESN
 states

Hello Steffen,

On 1/30/20 11:34 AM, Steffen Klassert wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 03:31:14PM +0100, Thomas Egerer wrote:
> 
> You need one more close bracket here:
> 
> /home/klassert/git/ipsec/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c: In function ‘copy_from_user_state’:
> /home/klassert/git/ipsec/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c:509:45: error: expected ‘)’ before ‘{’ token
>   if ((x->props.flags & XFRM_STATE_ESN) == 0 {
>                                              ^
> /home/klassert/git/ipsec/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c:515:1: error: expected expression before ‘}’ token
>  }
>  ^
> 
> Please fix and resend.
You're right. I wonder how that could have happened. I will rebuild
and make sure, I tested the kernel version including the patch and
not the one without.


Thomas