netdev - Re: IPv6 test fail

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 30 Jan 2020 13:13:09 +0100
From:   Levente <leventelist@...il.com>
To:     Alarig Le Lay <alarig@...rdarmor.fr>
Cc:     Captain Wiggum <captwiggum@...il.com>,
        Stephen Suryaputra <ssuryaextr@...il.com>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: IPv6 test fail

Dear All,


We fixed this issue. It seems that the connecting 3G modem had a bug.


Thanks for your help.


Bests,
Levente

On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 1:10 PM Alarig Le Lay <alarig@...rdarmor.fr> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> It seems that I’m not here for enough time, I can’t find your thread.
> What were your issues on IPv6? I hit some from migrating to 4.19 (from
> 4.4) on routers, so I’m still on 4.4 for now.
>
> We discussed it a bit on bird ML:
> https://bird.network.cz/pipermail/bird-users/2019-June/013509.html
> https://bird.network.cz/pipermail/bird-users/2019-November/013992.html
> https://bird.network.cz/pipermail/bird-users/2019-December/014011.html
>
> (sorry for the multiple links, it seems that the archive is split by
> months)
>
> By chances, are we hitting the same bug?
>
> Regards,
> Alarig Le Lay
>
> On mer. 29 janv. 15:31:20 2020, Captain Wiggum wrote:
> > (resending without html.:)
> > I started the thread.
> > We are using 4.19.x and 4.9.x, but for reference I also tested then current 5.x.
> > I believe we got it all worked out at the time.
> > --John Masinter
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 2:00 PM Stephen Suryaputra <ssuryaextr@...il.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > I am curious: what kernel version are you testing?
> > > I recall that several months ago there is a thread on TAHI IPv6.
> > > Including the person who started the thread.
> > >
> > > Stephen.
> > >
> > > On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 7:43 AM Levente <leventelist@...il.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Dear list,
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > We are testing IPv6 again against the test specification of ipv6forum.
> > > >
> > > > https://www.ipv6ready.org/?page=documents&tag=ipv6-core-protocols
> > > >
> > > > The test house state that some certain packages doesn't arrive to the
> > > > device under test. We fail test cases
> > > >
> > > > V6LC.1.2.2: No Next Header After Extension Header
> > > > V6LC.1.2.3: Unreacognized Next Header in Extension Header - End Node
> > > > V6LC.1.2.4: Extension Header Processing Order
> > > > V6LC.1.2.5: Option Processing Order
> > > > V6LC.1.2.8: Option Processing Destination Options Header
> > > >
> > > > The question is that is it possible that the this is the intended way
> > > > of operation? I.e. the kernel swallows those malformed packages? We
> > > > use tcpdump to log the traffic.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Thank you for your help.
> > > >
> > > > Levente