[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AM7PR04MB688559DED451E057CBFE46E5F81B0@AM7PR04MB6885.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 10:39:11 +0000
From: "Y.b. Lu" <yangbo.lu@....com>
To: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
CC: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"richardcochran@...il.com" <richardcochran@...il.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] ptp_qoriq: add initialization message
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2020 6:34 PM
> To: Y.b. Lu <yangbo.lu@....com>
> Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>; netdev@...r.kernel.org;
> richardcochran@...il.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] ptp_qoriq: add initialization message
>
> Hi Yangbo,
>
> On Wed, 12 Feb 2020 at 12:25, Y.b. Lu <yangbo.lu@....com> wrote:
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: netdev-owner@...r.kernel.org <netdev-owner@...r.kernel.org> On
> > > Behalf Of David Miller
> > > Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2020 9:07 AM
> > > To: Y.b. Lu <yangbo.lu@....com>
> > > Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org; richardcochran@...il.com
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] ptp_qoriq: add initialization message
> > >
> > > From: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@....com>
> > > Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 12:50:53 +0800
> > >
> > > > It is necessary to print the initialization result.
> > >
> > > No, it is not.
> >
> > Sorry, I should have added my reasons into commit message.
> > I sent out v2. Do you think if it makes sense?
> >
> > " Current ptp_qoriq driver prints only warning or error messages.
> > It may be loaded successfully without any messages.
> > Although this is fine, it would be convenient to have an oneline
> > initialization log showing success and PTP clock index.
> > The goods are,
> > - The ptp_qoriq driver users may know whether this driver is loaded
> > successfully, or not, or not loaded from the booting log.
> > - The ptp_qoriq driver users don't have to install an ethtool to
> > check the PTP clock index for using. Or don't have to check which
> > /sys/class/ptp/ptpX is PTP QorIQ clock."
> >
> > Thanks.
>
> How about this message which is already there?
> [ 2.603163] pps pps0: new PPS source ptp0
This message is from pps subsystem. We don't know what PTP clock is registered as ptp0.
And if the PTP clock doesn't support pps capability, even this log won't be showed.
Thanks.
>
> Thanks,
> -Vladimir
Powered by blists - more mailing lists