netdev - Re: [PATCH net] selftests: forwarding: vxlan_bridge

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 13 Feb 2020 13:52:49 +0100
From:   Petr Machata <pmachata@...il.com>
To:     Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] selftests: forwarding: vxlan_bridge_1d: fix tos value


Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com> writes:

> After commit 71130f29979c ("vxlan: fix tos value before xmit") we start
> strict vxlan xmit tos value by RT_TOS(), which limits the tos value less

I don't understand how it is OK to slice the TOS field like this. It
could contain a DSCP value, which will be mangled.

> than 0x1E. With current value 0x40 the test will failed with "v1: Expected
> to capture 10 packets, got 0". So let's choose a smaller tos value for
> testing.
>
> Fixes: d417ecf533fe ("selftests: forwarding: vxlan_bridge_1d: Add a TOS test")
> Signed-off-by: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/vxlan_bridge_1d.sh | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/vxlan_bridge_1d.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/vxlan_bridge_1d.sh
> index bb10e33690b2..353613fc1947 100755
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/vxlan_bridge_1d.sh
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/vxlan_bridge_1d.sh
> @@ -516,9 +516,9 @@ test_tos()
>  	RET=0
>
>  	tc filter add dev v1 egress pref 77 prot ip \
> -		flower ip_tos 0x40 action pass
> -	vxlan_ping_test $h1 192.0.2.3 "-Q 0x40" v1 egress 77 10
> -	vxlan_ping_test $h1 192.0.2.3 "-Q 0x30" v1 egress 77 0
> +		flower ip_tos 0x11 action pass
> +	vxlan_ping_test $h1 192.0.2.3 "-Q 0x11" v1 egress 77 10
> +	vxlan_ping_test $h1 192.0.2.3 "-Q 0x12" v1 egress 77 0

0x11 and 0x12 set the ECN bits, I think it would be better to avoid
that. It works just as well with 0x14 and 0x18.

>  	tc filter del dev v1 egress pref 77 prot ip
>
>  	log_test "VXLAN: envelope TOS inheritance"