lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sun, 16 Feb 2020 22:55:22 -0800
From:   Shannon Nelson <snelson@...sando.io>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/9] ionic: Add support for Event Queues

On 2/16/20 8:11 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Shannon Nelson <snelson@...sando.io>
> Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2020 15:11:49 -0800
>
>> This patchset adds a new EventQueue feature that can be used
>> for multiplexing the interrupts if we find that we can't get
>> enough from the system to support our configuration.  We can
>> create a small number of EQs that use interrupts, and have
>> the TxRx queue pairs subscribe to event messages that come
>> through the EQs, selecting an EQ with (TxIndex % numEqs).
> How is a user going to be able to figure out how to direct
> traffic to specific cpus using multiqueue settings if you're
> going to have the mapping go through this custom muxing
> afterwards?

When using the EQ feature, the TxRx are assigned to the EventQueues in a 
straight round-robin, so the layout is predictable.  I suppose we could 
have a way to print out the TxRx -> EQ -> Irq mappings, but I'm not sure 
where we would put such a thing.

sln

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ