[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a987bcd7-ca1c-dfda-72f3-cd2004a87ea5@ti.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 14:01:46 +0530
From: Faiz Abbas <faiz_abbas@...com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
CC: <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-can@...r.kernel.org>,
<broonie@...nel.org>, <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
<catalin.marinas@....com>, <mark.rutland@....com>,
<mkl@...gutronix.de>, <wg@...ndegger.com>,
<sriram.dash@...sung.com>, <dmurphy@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: m_can: Add Documentation for
transceiver regulator
Hi Rob,
On 20/02/20 2:05 am, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 07:58:34PM +0530, Faiz Abbas wrote:
>> Some CAN transceivers have a standby line that needs to be asserted
>> before they can be used. Model this GPIO lines as an optional
>> fixed-regulator node. Document bindings for the same.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Faiz Abbas <faiz_abbas@...com>
>> ---
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/m_can.txt | 3 +++
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> This has moved to DT schema in my tree, so please adjust it and resend.
Ok.
>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/m_can.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/m_can.txt
>> index ed614383af9c..f17e2a5207dc 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/m_can.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/m_can.txt
>> @@ -48,6 +48,9 @@ Optional Subnode:
>> that can be used for CAN/CAN-FD modes. See
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/can-transceiver.txt
>> for details.
>> +
>> +- xceiver-supply: Regulator that powers the CAN transceiver.
>
> The supply for a transceiver should go in the transceiver node.
>
Marc, while I have you here, do you agree with this?
Thanks,
Faiz
Powered by blists - more mailing lists