[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200224.153352.364779446032996784.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 15:33:52 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: hkallweit1@...il.com
Cc: bhelgaas@...gle.com, nic_swsd@...ltek.com, mlindner@...vell.com,
stephen@...workplumber.org, clemens@...isch.de, perex@...ex.cz,
tiwai@...e.com, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] PCI: add and use constant PCI_STATUS_ERROR_BITS
and helper pci_status_get_and_clear_errors
From: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 22:20:08 +0100
> Few drivers have own definitions for this constant, so move it to the
> PCI core. In addition there are several places where the following
> code sequence is used:
> 1. Read PCI_STATUS
> 2. Mask out non-error bits
> 3. Action based on set error bits
> 4. Write back set error bits to clear them
>
> As this is a repeated pattern, add a helper to the PCI core.
>
> Most affected drivers are network drivers. But as it's about core
> PCI functionality, I suppose the series should go through the PCI
> tree.
Heiner, something is up with this submission.
The subject line here says 0/9, but the patches say N/8 and patch #8 never
showed up on the list.
Sort out what this should be and resubmit, thank you.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists