[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <eb522c30-8d9b-0223-c152-9f2bd972c23b@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 07:23:50 +0100
From: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: bhelgaas@...gle.com, nic_swsd@...ltek.com, mlindner@...vell.com,
stephen@...workplumber.org, clemens@...isch.de, perex@...ex.cz,
tiwai@...e.com, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] PCI: add and use constant PCI_STATUS_ERROR_BITS and
helper pci_status_get_and_clear_errors
On 25.02.2020 00:33, David Miller wrote:
> From: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
> Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 22:20:08 +0100
>
>> Few drivers have own definitions for this constant, so move it to the
>> PCI core. In addition there are several places where the following
>> code sequence is used:
>> 1. Read PCI_STATUS
>> 2. Mask out non-error bits
>> 3. Action based on set error bits
>> 4. Write back set error bits to clear them
>>
>> As this is a repeated pattern, add a helper to the PCI core.
>>
>> Most affected drivers are network drivers. But as it's about core
>> PCI functionality, I suppose the series should go through the PCI
>> tree.
>
> Heiner, something is up with this submission.
>
> The subject line here says 0/9, but the patches say N/8 and patch #8 never
> showed up on the list.
>
> Sort out what this should be and resubmit, thank you.
>
Oops, sorry. I'll resubmit.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists