[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200226073602.GB10533@nanopsycho>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 08:36:02 +0100
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
kuba@...nel.org, intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org
Subject: Re: [patch net-next] iavf: use tc_cls_can_offload_basic() instead of
chain check
Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 10:20:41PM CET, davem@...emloft.net wrote:
>From: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
>Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 13:15:46 -0800
>
>> On Tue, 2020-02-25 at 13:10 +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>>> From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>
>>>
>>> Looks like the iavf code actually experienced a race condition, when
>>> a
>>> developer took code before the check for chain 0 was put to helper.
>>> So use tc_cls_can_offload_basic() helper instead of direct check and
>>> move the check to _cb() so this is similar to i40e code.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>
>>
>> Acked-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
>>
>> Go ahead and pick this up Dave, thanks!
>
>Hmmm, Jiri this doesn't compile?
Crap :/ I shuffled with the patches too much. Will send v2. Sorry.
>
> CC [M] drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_main.o
>drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_main.c: In function ‘iavf_setup_tc_block_cb’:
>drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_main.c:3089:7: error: implicit declaration of function ‘tc_cls_can_offload_basic’; did you mean ‘tc_cls_common_offload_init’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> if (!tc_cls_can_offload_basic(adapter->netdev, type_data))
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> tc_cls_common_offload_init
>
>Maybe it does depend upon something in the tc filter patch series?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists