[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200226082157.13848-1-jiri@resnulli.us>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 09:21:57 +0100
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com,
intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org
Subject: [patch net-next v2] iavf: use tc_cls_can_offload_and_chain0() instead of chain check
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>
Looks like the iavf code actually experienced a race condition, when a
developer took code before the check for chain 0 was put to helper.
So use tc_cls_can_offload_and_chain0() helper instead of direct check and
move the check to _cb() so this is similar to i40e code.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>
---
v1->v2:
- rebased on top of net-next (using the correct helper name)
---
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_main.c | 8 +++++---
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_main.c
index 62fe56ddcb6e..76361bd468db 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_main.c
@@ -3061,9 +3061,6 @@ static int iavf_delete_clsflower(struct iavf_adapter *adapter,
static int iavf_setup_tc_cls_flower(struct iavf_adapter *adapter,
struct flow_cls_offload *cls_flower)
{
- if (cls_flower->common.chain_index)
- return -EOPNOTSUPP;
-
switch (cls_flower->command) {
case FLOW_CLS_REPLACE:
return iavf_configure_clsflower(adapter, cls_flower);
@@ -3087,6 +3084,11 @@ static int iavf_setup_tc_cls_flower(struct iavf_adapter *adapter,
static int iavf_setup_tc_block_cb(enum tc_setup_type type, void *type_data,
void *cb_priv)
{
+ struct iavf_adapter *adapter = cb_priv;
+
+ if (!tc_cls_can_offload_and_chain0(adapter->netdev, type_data))
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
switch (type) {
case TC_SETUP_CLSFLOWER:
return iavf_setup_tc_cls_flower(cb_priv, type_data);
--
2.21.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists