[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87o8tlzppw.fsf@toke.dk>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 10:02:03 +0100
From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>, Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org,
David Ahern <dahern@...italocean.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next] virtio_net: Relax queue requirement for using XDP
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com> writes:
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 09:34:51AM +0100, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>> we already do block some reconfiguration if an XDP program is loaded
>> (such as MTU changes), so there is some precedence for that :)
> Do we really block MTU changes when XDP is loaded?
> Seems to work for me - there's a separate discussion going
> on about how to handle MTU changes - see
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/7df5bb7f-ea69-7673-642b-f174e45a1e64@digitalocean.com
> virtio_net: can change MTU after installing program
Maybe not for virtio_net, but that same thing doesn't work on mlx5:
$ sudo ip link set dev ens1f1 mtu 8192
RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument
-Toke
Powered by blists - more mailing lists