[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200313100118.GF14553@lunn.ch>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 11:01:18 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
Cc: Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>,
Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Li Yang <leoyang.li@....com>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] net: dsa: felix: allow the device to be disabled
e> IMHO since DSA is already dependent on device tree for PHY bindings,
> it would make more sense to move this there:
That is not really true. You can instantiate a marvell switch using a
platform device. So long any you only have C22 PHYs in a sane
configuration, it will just work. There are boards out there do this,
on x86 platforms without device tree.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists